It is mainly important to analyze all the features involved in every test taken
by a person, and it is straightforward thinking that not all tasks are with full
concentration because the nature of the tool, is an app, and we might expect the
people taking the test can get distracted by some random reason
The main objective here is to analyze any pattern related to the time in
milliseconds a participant spend on responding every visual task.
In [None]:
In [None]:
In [None]:
In [None]:
In [None]:
Population of Study
In [None]:
We choose the score variable as the number of correct answers on every test
In [None]:
In [None]:
In [None]:
Defining Boundary
The first thing we have to consider is the time.
So we define $ \Delta_{tr} $ as the time elapsed between 2 trials, where a trial
is the event of push the buttom and select a digit on the test.
Thinking on this we say that every person perform $n$ number of tests and every
test has $m$ number of trials, then the time elapsed to perform every trial is $
\Delta_{tr} $
We define $T$ as the vector of time responses on an event, following this logic
we can calculate the median of those times.
Finally we may calculate the $SD$ of all the people on MS and Health Control
grou separatelly
Distraction Points
$T =(\Delta_{tr1}, \Delta_{tr2}, … \Delta_{trm})$
$tr =$ Time of response on a trial
In [None]:
Detecting Outliers
We can just take one single event on a random choise person (eobt3CosDzEtxWW5P)
for instance, and plot the time of response in milisecond alongside the 90
seconds showing the symbols choosen on each task
In [None]:
As we might see the points outside of the boundaries are distraction points
because they are 2 SD of the median time of response, where the SD corresponds
the variance of the group.
The plot below shows the distribution of the time of response in milliseconds on
this same event.
In [None]:
Distraction Points Correlated
The first thing to check is the relation that distracting points have with the
score performed on every individual, as we know each test has distraction points
and scores, we might aggregate per groups, then we can compare if there is any
difference between the number of distractions if a person is MS or HC
In [None]:
The table below shows the distractions and scores on each group
Group
Average Score
Average Distractions
MS
52.91
1.81
HC
46.22
1.49
In [None]:
In [None]:
As we may see on the plots above we see a negative and significative
correlation, the MS group is more clear.
The more distractions the less score
The number of distractions that a single person has is a clear feature that
helps to classify the MS people, this feature does not deoend in demographic
variables but just with in the test behaviour